AI as a co-regulator: relational design for strengthening self-regulated learning
A theoretical framework for understanding how AI can support learners as they plan, monitor, reflect, and adapt without displacing their agency, judgment, or growth.
A record of published research, public preprints, framework papers, manuscripts, proceedings, reports, expert contributions, and public-facing scholarship on how AI systems shape human agency, interpretation, accountability, learning, governance, and institutional life.
Publicly available work, manuscript-stage work, and formal contributions are separated by record type and status so the page remains clear, current, and careful about what each item represents.
This page separates public work, manuscript-stage work, formal contributions, applied writing, and citation profiles so visitors can scan the record without losing status clarity.
Peer-reviewed work, public preprints, and framework papers available to read now, organized to distinguish formal publication from public working papers and conceptual research artifacts.
A theoretical framework for understanding how AI can support learners as they plan, monitor, reflect, and adapt without displacing their agency, judgment, or growth.
A relational diagnostic of leadership education in AI-mediated contexts, arguing that algorithmic authority poses a legitimacy challenge when judgment is increasingly co-produced by humans and systems.
Public working papers and conceptual research artifacts available through arXiv and SSRN.
A behavioral audit of TextWalk, a minimal AI reading-assistant prototype designed to support close reading, structure-first engagement, interpretive humility, and learner-led meaning-making.
A diagnostic framework for understanding how AI systems can gradually erode relational integrity through ordinary interaction, shifting role clarity, accountability, authority, and meaning before visible harm appears.
A seven-level framework for understanding how human–AI engagement deepens across interaction contexts, and how responsibility, agency, authorship, and relational risk scale as AI systems become more influential in human thinking, work, and co-creation.
A conceptual essay examining how metaphors such as tool, assistant, tutor, mentor, or co-creator structure AI participation, shape role boundaries, and implicitly assign authority in human work.
A conceptual model examining how generative AI can shape whether possibilities persist, develop, branch, shift direction, or close over time, with relational integrity and human agency serving as governing conditions for responsible continuation.
A structural account of legitimacy in AI-mediated systems, arguing that meaning, evaluation, and obligation must remain visibly human-borne for participation to stay contestable and accountable.
Manuscripts are grouped by current status so submitted, under-consideration, abstract-stage, preparing, and developing work remain legible without implying acceptance.
Status labels describe the current stage of each work only. They do not imply acceptance, publication, or forthcoming status unless explicitly stated.
Manuscripts and articles that have been submitted, revised, or are presently under review or consideration.
A conceptual reframing of trust in AI around role drift, interpretive delegation, and the conditions under which AI participation remains legitimate, bounded, and contestable in human–AI interaction.
A feature article for ACM Interactions arguing that meaningful human oversight begins before AI outputs appear, at the level of task framing, assumptions, criteria, role expectations, and option visibility.
A submitted manuscript examining participation structure, interpretive authority, accountability, and how agentic AI systems participate in human–AI co-creation beyond simple assistance or output generation.
A submitted manuscript examining how authority migrates across AI-integrated knowledge work, and what that means for algorithmic legitimacy, institutional accountability, and human judgment.
Manuscripts or abstracts that are being prepared for final submission or are awaiting an abstract-stage decision.
A redirected manuscript for Policy Futures in Education developing adaptive coherence as a higher-education-specific capacity for translating strategic foresight into anticipatory governance, institutional policy translation, and educational practice under AI-era uncertainty.
An abstract-stage submission examining responsibility architecture in AI-mediated education, with attention to ethics, institutional conditions, and the structures that make responsible action possible.
Developing manuscripts and framework work that are not yet represented as submitted or under review.
A methods-oriented manuscript framing the AI Governance Simulation Lab as an LLM-mediated foresight method for examining role-based responsibility, stakeholder visibility, and governance readiness under uncertainty.
A framework manuscript developing a relational diagnostic approach for examining how responsibility is distributed, obscured, or weakened when AI becomes infrastructural across institutional settings.
Selected contributions to edited proceedings, expert reports, and public-interest research collections where the work appears as part of a broader scholarly or practitioner conversation.
A contribution to Children’s rights under pressure in a digital world, the 2026 Digital Futures for Children / ICA pre-conference proceedings anthology, listed under Theme 5: New technology.
An expert contribution in Building a Human Resilience Infrastructure for the AI Age, where Matthew Agustin is listed among the featured contributors in Chapter 1 on human agency and autonomy.
Public-facing essays, commentary, applied frameworks, and strategic resources will be added selectively when they extend the research record or make its concepts usable for broader audiences.
This section is reserved for public writing and applied resources that translate the work into accessible, practical, or institution-facing forms without diluting the distinction between formal scholarship, manuscript-stage work, and broader public engagement.
Across formats and venues, the work returns to how emerging systems reshape the conditions for human judgment, participation, responsibility, and public value.
The record is organized around the relational and institutional conditions that help people remain active participants in AI-mediated learning, work, governance, and public-interest systems.
Verification pathways for publications, preprints, citation tracking, researcher identity, and public-facing writing.
These profiles provide external pathways to publications, preprints, citation records, researcher identity, scholarly networks, and public-facing essays.
I welcome conversations with researchers, editors, educators, institutions, and public-interest teams working on responsible AI, relational AI, human agency, learning, governance, legitimacy, and public value.